Legal Opinion
Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1959No. Civ. No. 17660PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
This action, which is brought pursuant to section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, was instituted on May 27, 1957. The plaintiff seeks treble damages for alleged injury to its business by reason of alleged violations by the defendant of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2, claimed by the plaintiff to have begun some time prior ■to 1939, and to have continued up to the time of the filing of the complaint. The defendant’s monopolization of the shoe machinery market was the subject of a civil antitrust action commenced by the government in December, 1947.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Muskin Shoe Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- La Rouche v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Solinski v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Campbell Distributing Co. v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960