Legal Opinion
La Rouche v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 30, 1958No. Civ. A. 57-392PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, Chief Judge.
There is before the court the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The basis of the motion is that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15b, and also that the plaintiff has failed to allege any unlawful acts on the part of the defendant which were in furtherance of the defendant’s alleged monopoly and which injured the plaintiff.
The original complaint made allegations to the effect that the plaintiff was a competitor of the defendant and that he was damaged by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Image and Sound Service Corp. v. Altec Service Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
- Peller v. International Boxing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert H. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Citizens National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Denver Petroleum Corporation v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
- Muskin Shoe Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.