Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff moves for enlargement of time until November 1, 1960, to comply with the provision of calendar rule 1(b) ; to complete discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; and an order directing the defendant to produce for plaintiff’s inspection documents numbered 1 to 10 in the notice of motion.
The production of all of the said documents other than those referred to as items 7 and 8 has previously been denied by Judge Zavatt in Schwabe, Inc., v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., D.C., 23 F.R.D. 251, and by Judge Bryan in *229Buscher v. United Shoe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- Buscher v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973