Legal Opinion

Creelman v. Svenning

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 1, 1969No. 16-40041-1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. C. W. Creelman recovered special damages of $1,515 and general damages of $985 from Arville Svenning in an action tried to the court. Svenning appeals and his assignments of error challenge the adequacy of the record to support the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The facts as found by the trial court indicate Creelman and Svenning are adjoining property owners. Creelman purchased his lot from D. L. King in 1957 and Svenning from W. C. Gilchrist in 1960.

In 1956 King and Gilchrist constructed a joint road on or near the mutual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Robertson v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Charlton v. MarklandWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Low v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Gowin v. AltmillerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API