Legal Opinion
Gowin v. Altmiller
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 31, 1978No. Civ. 77-3056PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CALLISTER, District Judge.
The Court, having heard oral arguments and reviewed all depositions, pleadings, affidavits, answers to interrogatories and admissions, finds the following facts to be undisputed:
1. That plaintiff, Paul Gowin, was employed by defendant, Finke Lumber Company, Inc.;
2. That a dispute arose between defendant, Carl Finke, and Gowin concerning reimbursement for mileage costs, gas cans allegedly purchased by Gowin for Finke Lumber, wages for overtime, and gas charges allocated to Gowin;
3. That Gowin had in his possession a two-way radio and other tools and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert E. Sykes v. State of California (Department of Motor Vehicles)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Russell M. Smith v. John J. Cremins, Jr., John F. Mahon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Michael Arthur Donovan v. Earl Reinbold and Harley Askew, Michael Arthur Donovan v. Earl Reinbold and Harley AskewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Eldon O. Haldane v. Wilhelmina Helen King Chagnon, Horace N. Freedman, Lloyd S. Nix, Allen Miller, Wilfred H. TomlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gipson v. Township of Bass RiverDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
- Paul W. Gowin and Louise A. Gowin v. Leroy Altmiller, Harry Capaul, Carl Finke, Gerald Finke and Finke Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jenkins v. DanielsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Bussard v. NeilDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hamidian v. OccultoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.