Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Mayberry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1971No. 7123DC552PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Plaintiffs ask that the judgment be reversed and that this court declare them the legal owners of a 5/6 interest in the 13.60 acres of land in dispute. Their apparent position is that the evidence entitles them, as a matter of law, to the relief sought. We hold to the contrary.

In an action to remove cloud from title to real property, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove good title either against the whole world or against defendant by estoppel. Walker v. Story, 253 N.C. 59, 116 S.E. 2d 147; Lane v. Faust, 9 N.C. App. 427, 176 S.E. 2d 381.

In Mobley v. Griffin, 104 N.C. 112, 10…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Wilson v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Spivey v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Pegg v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Campbell v. MayberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API