Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 2013No. CFH080360; A146945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Following a jury trial, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, and theft in the first degree by receiving, ORS 164.095.1 Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a warrantless search of an RV trailer, contending that his consent to a search was improperly induced by an investigating police officer who gave a false promise of immunity. Or Const, Art I, § 9.2 We conclude that defendant’s consent was not voluntary, and the trial court’s error in denying defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. RitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API