State v. Mendacino
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The issue presented in this criminal case is whether a confession made by the defendant to a psychiatrist prior to arraignment should have been suppressed by the trial court.
On the night of Thursday, November 3, 1977, the defendant was present at the apartment where the six year old child of the defendant’s girl friend had been murdered. He was questioned at the scene by the police and at about 11 p.m. he was taken to a hospital to receive medical attention for a cut on his arm. Because the defendant’s statements to the police were inconsistent and contradictory, the police, at about…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.