San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Egenhoff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to an easement to construct and maintain a dam on defendant’s property during certain periods of each year and enjoining defendant’s interference therewith.
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in furnishing water for irrigation in the San Joaquin Valley. It maintains for this purpose a canal which passes through defendant’s lands within a two hundred foot right of way. The canal runs approximately north and south. At a point on defendant’s land the San Luis Creek with a flow generally from west to east…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Frost v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- North Fork Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dahl v. RettigColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gayton v. LebedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Board of Directors of Turlock Irrigation District v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010