Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 8, 2000No. Nos. 92-577C, 92-817CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This extensively chronicled Winstar-related case is before the court on defendant’s motions to dismiss and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on breach of contract.1 Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), successor in interest to the failed Security Savings and Loan Association (Security), and the shareholders of Security (Security shareholders).2 The plaintiffs collectively contend that Security Savings had enforceable contracts with the government with respect to the accounting and capital treatment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Dr. Ben Branch, Trustee of Bank of New England Corporation, Derivatively and on Behalf and in the Name of Maine National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. California Federal Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. California Housing Securities, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Suess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Ambase Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Hansen Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API