Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 27, 2003No. Nos. 02-5170, 03-5005PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
H.C. Bailey, Jr., et ai. (collectively “Bailey”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their contract damages and Fifth Amendment takings claims. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 265 (2001); Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 31 (2002); Bailey v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 251 (2002). Because the court correctly determined that neither party’s claims allege an Article III case or controversy or Fifth Amendment taking, we affirm.
Background
This…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- La Van v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Ambase Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.