Legal Opinion

Clinton Nat. Bank v. McKennon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 605PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court. Ouster County; James B. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Chandler B. McKennon against the Clinton National Bank. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Wilson’s St. 1903, eh. 50. secs. 5, 10, 11, 18; ch. 63, secs. 12, 13; Buxlon v. Merc. Co., 18 Olda. 288; 28 Am. & Eng. Ene. L. 686.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

This is a suit in the nature of trover commenced by Chandler B. McKennon, defendant in error, plaintiff below, in the district court of Custer county, against the Clinton National Bank, plaintiff in error, for the value of a diamond ring. For answer to the petition defendant filed a general denial. There was trial to a jury. At the close of the testimony on both sides, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff, which they did, for $233.40, upon which judgment was rendered and entered, and defendant brings the case here. The bank assigns that the court erred in directing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Frick v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Phelps, Dodge and Palmer Co. v. Halsell and FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Gillett v. Burlington InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Buxton v. Alton-Dawson Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Offutt v. WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Bilby v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API