Legal Opinion

Bird v. Saenz

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2002No. S095474PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

123 Cal.Rptr.2d 465 (2002)

28 Cal.4th 910

51 P.3d 324

Janice BIRD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Rolando SAENZ et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S095474.

Supreme Court of California.

August 12, 2002.

Steven G. Cohn, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Schmid & Voiles, Susan H. Schmid, Suzanne De Rosa; Thelen Reid & Priest, Curtis A. Cole and Kenneth R. Pedroza, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents Rolando Saenz and David M. Fung.

Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols, David J. O'Keefe, Patricia Egan Daehnke, Los Angeles, Michael A. Gregg, Mark B. Connely, San Luis Obispo,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spangler v. BechtelIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kempton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Bailey v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Fortman v. Förvaltningsbolaget Insulan ABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. RA v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API