Legal Opinion

Fortman v. Förvaltningsbolaget Insulan AB

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 2013No. B237818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

Barbara Fortman seeks to recover as a bystander for the emotional distress she suffered when she witnessed the tragic death of her brother Robert Myers while they were scuba diving off the coast of Catalina Island. At the time of the accident, Fortman thought her brother had a heart attack. She later learned that a plastic flow-restriction insert manufactured by defendant Forvaltningsbolaget Insulan AB, doing business as SI Tech (the company), had become lodged in Myers’s second-stage regulator, which prevented him from getting enough air to breathe while underwater.

In Thing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ambriz v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Doe v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  3. Downey v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Marc Chartier, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Chartier v. Apple Therapy of Londonderry, LLC & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2023
  5. Williams v. J-M Manufacturing CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API