Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1989No. 68119, 68121 consPublishedCited by 195 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

On December 30, 1982, defendant Corroon and Black of Illinois terminated the employment of plaintiff Raul Castaneda. On February 14, 1983, plaintiff filed a charge of discrimination with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (hereinafter the Department). The Department then filed a formal complaint against defendant, alleging violations of plaintiff’s civil rights. After a full hearing, an administrative law judge found no discrimination and recommended that the complaint be dismissed. A three-member panel of the Illinois Human Rights Commission (hereinafter the Commission) adopted the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Walker v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by195 opinions

  1. People v. MaggetteIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Collins v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Beahringer v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bubb v. Springfield School District 186Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API