Kouns v. Paulus
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Petitioner objects to a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative petition. This is the same initiative petition and the same ballot title involved in Fithian-Barrett v. Paulus, 296 Or 819, 680 P2d 381 (1984).
As set forth in our opinion in that case, the initiative petition, among other things, contains provisions that “[articles, information and statements obtained in violation of [specified constitutional rights] shall not be admissible in evidence if such articles, information, and statements would be inadmissible under the decisions of the United States…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fithian-Barrett v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nearman/Miller v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Christ/Tauman v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995