Legal Opinion

Kouns v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1984No. SC S30486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner objects to a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative petition. This is the same initiative petition and the same ballot title involved in Fithian-Barrett v. Paulus, 296 Or 819, 680 P2d 381 (1984).

As set forth in our opinion in that case, the initiative petition, among other things, contains provisions that “[articles, information and statements obtained in violation of [specified constitutional rights] shall not be admissible in evidence if such articles, information, and statements would be inadmissible under the decisions of the United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fithian-Barrett v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nearman/Miller v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Christ/Tauman v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crumpton v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API