Legal Opinion

Crumpton v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1995No. SC S42252Published

1Opinion of the Court

896 P.2d 577 (1995)

321 Or. 269

Robert CRUMPTON, Petitioner,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and

Ruth Bendl, Intervenor.

SC S42252.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted May 23, 1995.

Resubmitted May 26, 1995.

Decided June 22, 1995.

Paul Gamson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Ruth Bendl, intervenor, filed a…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sampson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API