Legal Opinion
Silvesky v. Greyhound Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1959No. Civ. No. 19046PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
This is a motion by the third party defendant, Stephen Dobbs, to dismiss the *379third party complaint wherein The Greyhound Corporation is named as the plaintiff, on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action.
Plaintiffs brought this action against Greyhound for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the automobile in which they were riding was struck by a bus operated by Greyhound. It thereupon served a summons and third party complaint upon Stephen Dobbs alleging that he was actively negligent in operating his car in that he swerved in front of the bus…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Dalury v. LutzNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Epstein v. Empress Hotel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Flory v. Elmira Hotel Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- Choate v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1964
- Goldstein v. Compudyne Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Kenrose Manufacturing Co. v. Fred Whitaker Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971