Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Compudyne Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 26, 1968No. 64 Civ. 3863PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues for personal injuries suffered in an explosion of a jet engine testing machine. Defendant Compudyne manufactured and assembled the machine, and defendant Wallace & Tiernan manufactured the component part, an oil gauge, which allegedly failed and caused the explosion. Plaintiff asserts three claims: negligent design and manufacture, breach of warranty of fitness for intended purpose, and violation of two safety statutes of New York, §§ 200 and 241 of the New York Labor Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 31.
Defendant Compudyne moves under Rule 14(a),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phœnix Bridge Co. v. CreemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Wischnie v. DorschNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Bush Terminal Buildings Co. v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shafarman v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Willie v. Amerada Hess Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Holzhauser v. Container Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
- Moore v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.