Legal Opinion
Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1994No. Nos. 93-36162, 94-35042PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Plaintiffs-appellants Pacific Rivers Council, et al. (PRC) appeal the district court’s grant of a partial injunction. This injunction bars the United States Forest Service (Forest Service) from announcing, awarding or conducting any additional timber sales, range activities, or road building projects in the Wallowa-Whitman and Umatilla National Forests until it commences consultation procedures as required by the Endangered Species Act § 7(a)(2), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2) (ESA). The basis for the injunction was that the Forest Service had failed to consult with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Pacific Rivers Council v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Marbled Murrelet v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.