State v. Kissell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
In this case, we are again presented with the issue we confronted in State v. Neidenbach, 73 Or App 476, 698 P2d 1040, rev allowed 299 Or 522, 702 P2d 1112, rev dismissed 300 Or 176, 707 P2d 355 (1985): whether the exclusionary rule applies to. probation revocation hearings. In Neidenbach, we held that it did; we now overrule that decision.
Defendant pled guilty to one count of felony driving while suspended. The court suspended imposition of sentence for two years and placed him on probation. Subsequently, defendant was stopped by a police officer after an anonymous tip that “a person” was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Ex Parte CaffieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. MaricichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.