Legal Opinion
State v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 11, 2007No. C032034CR; A129039PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation. He assigns error to the trial court’s admission of hearsay evidence at his probation revocation hearing. According to defendant, the admission of that evidence violated his Sixth Amendment confrontation right as articulated by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). The state responds that probation revocation hearings are not criminal prosecutions to which the principles in Crawford apply. We agree with the state and affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant was convicted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. EsquilinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Henderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.