Gillingham Construction Inc. v. Newby-Wiggins Construction Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a directed verdict dismissing the plaintiffs claim for breach of a construction contract. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Viewing the evidence favorably to the appellant Gillingham Construction, Inc., (Gillingham), as we must on an appeal from a directed verdict, the facts are as follows. The State of Idaho awarded the respondent Newby-Wiggins Construction, Inc., (NewbyWiggins) the prime contract to construct the regional headquarters building for the Idaho Department of Parks and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Sheridan v. St. Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Ramerth v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Todd v. Sullivan Construction LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Gillingham Construction, Inc. v. Newby-Wiggins Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Hansen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- University of Idaho Foundation, Inc. v. Civic Partners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.