Shoemaker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FITZPATRICK, J.
Charles Eugene Shoemaker (appellant) was found guilty in a bench trial of driving while intoxicated in violation of Code § 18.2-266. He argues that the trial court erred by failing to dismiss the charge against him after it determined that the results of appellant’s independent blood test were unavailable. Because we find that the Commonwealth failed to substantially comply with the requirements of Code § 18.2-268.6, we reverse the conviction and dismiss the prosecution.
BACKGROUND
On September 7, 1991, at approximately 12:50 a.m., appellant, driving a 1978 Ford pickup…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walton v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Breeden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Wendel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Kemp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Snead v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stevens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Cutright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Stevens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Frank Glading Shelton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SutherlandLancaster County Circuit Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.