Breeden v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELDER, J.
Brenda Breeden, appellant, appeals from her conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of Code § 18.2-266(ii). She contends that she should not have been convicted of the charge because the Commonwealth denied her the right to a blood test without showing that a blood test was unavailable. We find that her right to a blood test was denied when she was refused such a test without a showing that it was unavailable. As a result, we hold that the charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol should have been dismissed because the denial of her right…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Driver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rasmussen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Cutright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Lamay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Oliver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Mason v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.