Legal Opinion

Walton v. City of Roanoke

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 2, 1963No. Record 5669PublishedCited by 56 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, J.

This is an appeal by Charles Berkley Walton, the defendant, from a conviction of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of an ordinance of the city of Roanoke.

The sole question presented is whether the court erred in admitting into evidence testimony concerning a chemical analysis of defendant’s blood to determine its alcoholic content. Counsel for defendant contends that under § 18.1-55, Code of 1950, as amended, 1960 Repl. Vol., 1962. Supp., commonly known as the “implied consent law,” the defendant was compelled to give evidence against himself in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Finley v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. United States Ex Rel. Theodore R. Stovall v. Honorable Wilfred Denno, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Ossining, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Farmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API