Legal Opinion

Wendel v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 16, 1991No. Record No. 0252-90-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Charles T. Wendel, Jr. was found guilty of driving while intoxicated in violation of Code § 18.2-266. When arrested, Wendel was informed of Virginia’s implied consent law. He elected to have a sample of his blood taken for analysis. At some point before trial, Wendel requested the Commonwealth’s result of his blood analysis pursuant to Code § 18.2-268 (M), which provides:

Upon the request of the person whose blood or breath or both blood and breath sample was taken for chemical tests to determine the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overbee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Brooks v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Lee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  4. Schmidt v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Shumate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thurston v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Castillo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  3. Cutright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  4. Shoemaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  5. Kemp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API