Wendel v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Charles T. Wendel, Jr. was found guilty of driving while intoxicated in violation of Code § 18.2-266. When arrested, Wendel was informed of Virginia’s implied consent law. He elected to have a sample of his blood taken for analysis. At some point before trial, Wendel requested the Commonwealth’s result of his blood analysis pursuant to Code § 18.2-268 (M), which provides:
Upon the request of the person whose blood or breath or both blood and breath sample was taken for chemical tests to determine the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Overbee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Brooks v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Lee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Schmidt v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Shumate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thurston v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Castillo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Cutright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Shoemaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Kemp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.