Legal Opinion

Altermatt v. Dillman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1934No. Docket No. 5, Calendar No. 37,769PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs, land owners, liable for special assessments for benefits for the so-called “Mound Road” superhighway in Macomb county, filed a bill, of complaint claiming all of the actions and proceedings taken to survey, locate, establish and construct such highway and to build the same, to levy and spread assessments and apportion the same, are fraudulent, null and void, and should be set aside, canceled and held for naught; and, the county treasurer of Macomb county and his successor in office be perpetually enjoined from collecting or attempting to collect any of the assessments levied…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Motz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Atwell v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Brown v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elba Township v. Gratiot County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hack v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API