Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 37,731Published

1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, C. J.

Section 66 of what is known as the Covert act, being 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4381, reads, in part, as follows:

“The proceedings herein provided for improving any highway, shall be subject to review upon certiorari. # * * The entire proceedings shall not be set aside except where the county road commissioners, or the State highway commissioner, axe found to have no jurisdiction to act upon the petition presented. * * * If no certiorari be brought within the time herein described, the improvements shall be deemed to have been legally ordered and established, and its legality shall not thereafter be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clinton v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Auditor General v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Township of Clarence v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cummings v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API