Legal Opinion

Del Campo v. Kennedy

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 5, 2006No. C 01-21151 JWPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

JAMES WARE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1985, the California Legislature created a misdemeanor diversion program to address the growing problem of accused bad check writers inundating the state’s criminal courts. Cal. Pen.Code § 1001.60 et seq. The diversion program is intended to provide a feasible alternative to criminal prosecution by offering bad check writers a chance to pay their debts and clear the incident reports against them…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Managed Accounts Receivables Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  2. Schwarm v. CraigheadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  3. Kevin Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Jean v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Scocca v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API