Legal Opinion
Schwarm v. Craighead
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 5, 2008No. CIV. 05-01304 WBS GGHPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Kristy Schwarm, Patricia Fo-ronda, and Josann Ancelet filed this class action lawsuit against defendants Henry Craighead, District Attorney Technical Services, Ltd. (DATS), John Q. Lawson, and Mary A. Chase based on defendants’ collection efforts. Plaintiffs now move for summary judgment with respect to their claims against Craighead for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, and the procedural due process clauses of the federal and state…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Robinson v. Managed Accounts Receivables Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Fontell v. HassettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Alaska Trustee, LLC v. AmbridgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Moritz v. Daniel N. Gordon, P.C.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Winberry v. UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.