Legal Opinion

Kevin Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2017No. 15-16549 16-16495PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs are individuals who are subject to potential prosecution for violations of California’s bad check statute, which criminalizes the writing of bad checks with intent to defraud. The Defendants, Victim Services and related companies (collectively, “VSI”), pursuant to an agreement with the District Attorney’s office, sent notices to the Plaintiffs that to avoid criminal prosecution they could participate in California’s Bad Check Diversion Program, including payment of specified fees. Plaintiffs filed this putative class action claiming VSI’s practices…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chris Langer v. Milan KiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. ROSEN VS. TARKANIANNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In re Outlaw Labs., LP Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. Kristina J. Polak & Stephen M. Polak v. Felipe Ramirez-Diaz & Yesica SanchezSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API