Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1971No. Appeals, Nos. 139 and 140Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

In these two actions in assumpsit the plaintiff-appellant, Lenora Thompson, sought to recover from the defendants-appellees, The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and United States Steel Corporation, the sums of $2,000 and $1,000 respectively on two group insurance certificates issued by The Equita*341ble Life Assurance Society of the United States. The named insured on the certificates was appellant’s husband, Coster Thompson, who was an employee of United States Steel Corporation (or its predecessor, Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Spradlin v. Columbia Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. Selden v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Smith v. Peacock Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API