Legal Opinion

Selden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1946No. Appeal, 65PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The issue here involved presents no real difficulty of solution because it is governed by elementary principles of the law of contracts.

Defendant company issued to Jules B. Selden two policies of insurance against the results of bodily injuries caused by violent and accidental means; in one of them the beneficiary was Selden’s mother, in the other his estate. He died on December 31, 1941, from a gunshot wound of the head. The policies provided that affirmative proof of loss must be furnished to the company within ninety days after the date of such loss.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hocking v. Howard InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Girard Life Insurance, Annuity & Trust Co. v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. O'Connor v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lardas v. Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. General State Authority v. Planet InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Terpeluk v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Lyons v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API