Legal Opinion
Rennie v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided September 18, 1997No. Civ. 94-82; Civ. 95-104MPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtResnick, Judge
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISQUALIFY LISA MOORHEAD, ESQ. AND DENYING THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE LAW OFFICES OF ROHN & CUSICK
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a motion filed by defendants Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. ["HOVIC"] and Amerada Hess Corporation ["AHC"] seeking the disqualification of Attorney Lisa Moorhead ["Moorhead] and the Law Offices of Rohn & Cusick ["Rohn & Cusick"] in the above-captioned matters. Plaintiffs Rennie et al. and Griffith et al., represented by Rohn & Cusick, filed an opposition. The plaintiffs in Civ. Nos. 1994-81 and 1995-66, also filed an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- General Motors Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Kesselhaut v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33, American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamb v. Pralex Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
- Denis v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006
- In re Condemnation of Lands Situate and Being in the City of Scranton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1998