Legal Opinion
Denis v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided October 25, 2006No. Civil No. 606/2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Superior Court Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(October 25, 2006)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel by Defendant Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (“Garlock”), Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, and Defendant’s reply to the opposition. For the reasons below, Defendant’s Motion to Disqualify is granted.
Background
This case concerns harm allegedly suffered by Plaintiffs due to exposure to asbestos. The instant motions concern the impact of the hiring of Attorney Anna Washburn by Plaintiffs’ firm, the Law Offices of Rohn & Cameron. Attorney Washburn…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Central Milk Producers Cooperative, Central Milk Sales Agency, Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. Sentry Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Church of Scientology of California, a Non-Profit Corporation, Under the Laws of California v. John McLean and Nancy McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Brice v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.