Kesselhaut v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ request for review of an order by Trial Judge Schwartz, stating that counsel for plaintiffs in the above action, the firm of Krooth and Altman, their partners and associates, are disqualified to represent plaintiffs in connection with *126the claims grounded upon a contract implied in fact, or express, and therefore directing them promptly to withdraw as counsel. The court heard the case en banc, and on October 22, 1976, entered an order remanding the case to Trial Judge Roald Hogenson, Chief of the Trial Division for further fact finding. Trial Judge…
2Cited by51 opinions
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Sca Services, Inc. v. Hon. Robert D. Morgan, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.