Legal Opinion

Hodges v. TRAIL CREEK IRRIGATION COMPANY

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1956No. 8407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

The parties to this action will be referred to as they appear in the trial court. Appellant will be designated as plaintiff and respondent as defendant. *13Plaintiff’s predecessor in interest appropriated 1.6 second feet of the waters of Trail Creek for irrigation use on the North Half of the Northwest Quarter (N% NW%.) of Section 10, Township 3 N, R. 45 E, B.M. in Teton County by priority of 1896. Plaintiff acquired title to the land in 1940. The water was decreed to plaintiff’s predecessor in 1910. The waters were diverted to plaintiff’s land, or his predecessor’s in interest,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Zezi v. LightfootIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Welch v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Idaho Farms Co. v. North Side Canal Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. McCray v. RosenkranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Almo Water Company v. DarringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API