Legal Opinion

Lloyd B. Hart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1958No. 15849_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

The District Court denied appellant’s motion, made under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, to have some language in a sentencing order deleted so as to prevent it from being accorded any effect, or alternatively to have it declared that such language was without any significance. The language challenged had relation to the time when service of the sentence should commence to run.

The judge by whom the sentence was imposed had died, so that the motion was heard by another judge of the same court. In holding that appellant was not entitled to the relief sought, the court took occasion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Ex Rel. Rowe v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States Ex Rel. Nicholson v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Tippitt v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Boyd v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William Ernest Sadler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Kenneth James Truesdell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Richard Paul DarudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Carl Earnest McCraw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API