United States v. Richard Paul Darud

In this appeal Richard Paul Darud challenges the sentence imposed on his plea of guilty to charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(1)(D). Darud argues that the district court 1 erred in imposing a sentence running consecutively to rather than concurrently with a reinstated term of imprisonment stemming from the revocation of his parole with respect to an earlier conviction. We find Darud’s claim without merit, and affirm.

The facts from which this controversy is an outgrowth are undisputed. In May, 1983 Darud pleaded guilty to a charge…