Legal Opinion

Kenneth James Truesdell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1968No. 19146_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court denying appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., to correct an alleged illegal sentence.

The appellant is serving concurrent sentences of fifteen years imposed on his pleas of guilty to entering two federally-insured banks — one on February 3, 1962, the other on February 23,1962 — with intent to commit larceny therein in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Appellant was represented by counsel and did not question the sentences at the time they were imposed.

The judgments entered on April 23, 1962, by Honorable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States Ex Rel. Lombardo v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. Kirk v. SiquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Alfred James Williams, Jr. v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Forrest Brooks, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. John Henry LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Lovell v. ArnoldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Dixon v. BlackenseeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  5. Transportation of Federal Prisoners to State Courts Pursuant to Writs of Habeas Corpus, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API