Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 26, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

— Affirming.

*416The appellee, John McCoy, by his petition and amended petitions, substantially alleged, that by the invitation of the persons in charge of a train of appellant, he got upon the train to ride a short distance to where the train would make another stop, and that shortly after the train started fropi the point, at which he had gotten upon it, one of the servants of appellant undertook to-require him to leave the train, while it was running at a high speed, and upon his failure to leave the train, the employe, who had directed him to leave it,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Sullivan v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Continental Ins. v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Charles Taylor Sons Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Cornett's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Shafer v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Arthur v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  5. West v. Butler's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API