Legal Opinion

Woodhall v. Irwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Minnie Woodhall presented her claim for compensation against John B. Irwin for the accidental death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Southern Surety Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

Told in outline, the story in the record is a very ordinary and simple one. The owner of a store building wanted some repairs made to the front of it. What were needed to make the repairs were some mortar, a ladder, and a man with a trowel and bucket who knew how to do the work. It was a two or three or four-dollar job. The owner called up a general building and repairing contractor, Mr. Irwin, one of three contractors whom he had at times engaged to repair his buildings, and asked him to take care of the matter — to do the work. After some delay, Mr. Irwin sent Alfred Woodhall, a plasterer,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Holbrook v. Olympia Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Steen v. PottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bert Baker, Inc. v. RyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hanisko v. Fitzpatrick BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API