Legal Opinion

Von Beltz v. Stuntman, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1989No. B022306PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

I. Introduction

Does a movie stuntperson assume the risk of injury by performing a movie stunt? Is a stuntperson who fails to employ a seat belt during an automobile stunt contributorily negligent? These are the two principal questions addressed in this appeal.

Motion pictures remain one of the premier forms of entertainment in today’s world. Movies frequently entertain through flights of fantastic adventure, heavily laden with excitement and danger. Motion picture producers and directors are often able to achieve such results by employing tricks of the trade (e.g., animation,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Persson v. Smart Inventions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Saenz v. Whitewater Voyages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Rosh v. Cave Imaging Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Scott v. Phoenix Schools, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API