Legal Opinion

Bateman Construction, Inc. v. Haitsuka Bros., Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1995No. 17745PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

To capsulize the intent behind Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 658, Arbitration and Awards, we have stated that by-agreeing to arbitration “it was [the arbitrator’s] judgment [the parties] bargained for, not a court’s.” Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp., 66 Haw. 663, 670, 675 P.2d 760, 766 (1983). In this arbitration matter, Respondent/Counter-Claimant-Appellant Haitsuka Brothers, Limited (Haitsu-ka) and Claimant/Counter-Respondent-Ap-pellee Bateman Construction, Inc., (Bate-man) submitted contract disputes to the American Arbitration Association (AAA) for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Association of Owners of Kukui Plaza v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fsc Securities Corporation Marlis Gilbert Integrated Financial Services and Richard E. Connolly, Jr. v. Judy Freel Mirle Freel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Price v. Obayashi Hawaii Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ueoka v. SzymanskiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API