Legal Opinion
Hesseltine v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 23, 2005No. Civ.A. 1:03-CV-865PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company’s (“Goodyear”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 97). Goodyear seeks summary judgment on Plaintiffs Donald Hesseltine (“Hesseltine”), Charles Dwayne Parrish (“Parrish”), and David Day’s (“Day”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) claims alleging unpaid overtime compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207, 216(b) (2000). Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court is of the…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nehmelman v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- England v. Advance Stores Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Brubach v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Bell v. Iowa Turkey Growers CooperativeDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Agee v. WAYNE FARMS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.