Legal Opinion
Holeman v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 22, 1988No. Civ. A. CA 7-86-0104PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY LOU ROBINSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is granted.
Defendant filed this Motion for Summary Judgment claiming that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Plaintiff had failed to comply with the requirement of the insurance policy that a sworn proof of loss be submitted within 60 days of the loss and that Plaintiff had failed to comply with the requirements of the Federal Tort Claims Act in bringing his Deceptive Trade Practices claims.
Plaintiff maintains that the letter and spirit of the requirement were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- A.L.T. Corporation v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- In Re ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Cohen v. Federal Insurance AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Durkin v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
- Jamal v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Eaker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Smith v. National Flood Insurance Program of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Burns v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.