Durkin v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant’s motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment and plaintiffs motion for continuance of the summary judgment proceeding. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion for continuance is DENIED, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
I. Background
This action involves a damage claim under a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Program, 42 U.S.C. 4001-4129 (1997) (“NFIP”). 1 Plaintiff, Steve Durkin, purchased the policy from defendant, State…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Cohen v. State Farm Fire & CasualtyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Neill v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.