Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 90-846PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The defendant was charged with conspiracy to possess a narcotic drug for sale. Within two months of the defendant’s arrest, the state filed a motion to dismiss the charge. At the hearing on the motion, the state’s attorney failed to appear. The judge did not hear argument on the motion and observed on the record that he had not reviewed the defendant’s response to the motion. The judge nonetheless ordered the case dismissed without prejudice, provided that after ninety days the dismissal would be with prejudice unless the state convinced the court that it should be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. TorresArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. VaskoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. RaschCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. GranadosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. State v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API