State v. Gilbert
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The defendant was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit fraudulent schemes and artifices and eight counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices. The trial judge granted the state’s motion to dismiss the charges without prejudice, but over the state’s objection, ruled that if the state did not recharge the defendant within 120 days, the dismissal would automatically become a dismissal with prejudice. The trial judge reasoned that “it is in the interest of the public and the orderly administration of justice that there be some type of finality.” We hold that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Litak v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. GranadosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State of Arizona v. Ramon LimonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.